Could A New Redfish War Emerge?
Catching Mackerel in a Chill
November 3, 2021
Bonefish Habitat Receives Major Protection
November 4, 2021
Did you know for the last 20 years there has been a contingent of commercial anglers wanting to make the redfish a commercially harvested species again?
To look at where the future of redfish is heading, it is necessary to first take a brief look at the past.
For many years, commercial fishermen targeted redfish heavily with gill nets, purse seines, and other highly effective tools. Fisheries agencies even allowed recreational anglers to use gill nets in Texas to catch reds and other popular fishes. My dad used to run a gill net when he was a kid and talked about catching entire schools of fish at a time. Now it seems like a waste, but back then that was the way people did things. By the 1970’s, the American public fell in love with redfish, partly because of New Orleans Chef Paul Prudhomme’s famous “blackened redfish” recipe.
The result was that redfish populations were ravaged, and recreational fishermen experienced terrible fishing conditions.
A group of concerned coastal anglers fought to get the redfish classified as a game fish and therefore protected from commercial harvest. Many outdoor writers call those days the “redfish wars,” which spawned the Gulf Coast Conservation Association (GCCA), now Coastal Conservation Association (CCA).
The banning of commercial redfish harvest along with aggressive stocking efforts spearheaded by the then Gulf Coast Conservation Association (GCCA) and the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD) gave the redfish population a much-needed boost. At the time of this writing, Texas has stocked more than 100,000,000 redfish fingerlings into coastal bay systems and estuaries. TPWD officials also placed a slot limit on redfish that protected the mature breeding specimens (bull reds) from harvest.
By the early 1990’s, redfish numbers had stabilized and recreational fishermen started catching lots of them. In fact, by 1994 redfish numbers got so high that TPWD biologists decided it was okay for anglers to harvest a couple of bull redfish each year. TPWD initiated a special red drum “trophy tag.” Fast forward to the 2000s.
Now, redfish are super abundant with record numbers reported in bay systems along the Gulf Coast. Anglers are enjoying a redfish renaissance of sorts. But there are reasons to be concerned.
For example there is a contingent of anglers in Louisiana who say redfish are responsible for causing severe declines in the number and average size of blue crabs in the marshes of Louisiana. I am sure it is not the hundreds of thousands of crab traps in their marshes.
It must be the redfish, right? Back in 2001, the Red Drum Advisory Panel (RDAP) of the Gulf of Mexico Fisheries Management Council (GMFMC) asked federal fisheries managers to consider a “limited commercial season” for redfish. They passed on it the first time, but a similar proposal came up in 2015. Redfish stocks may indeed be able to sustain a commercial harvest, and to be perfectly fair, those fish do not belong to sport fishermen or anyone else for that matter–they are supposed to be a public resource.
On the other hand, sport anglers are the ones who paid for redfish restoration through saltwater stamp sales, and funded massive stocking programs that increased overall numbers of the fish in Texas and elsewhere along the Gulf Coast. Sport fishermen have lived with restrictive redfish limits to help bolster this magnificent fish. The last time the commercial fishermen had a go with redfish, they nearly fished them into oblivion. That is not an opinion, but a documented fact. These proposals keep popping up but never see the light of day. Numerous other issues are taking up the time and resources of NMFS, and support for redfish conservation is still high among conservation groups and state fish and game agencies Only time will tell whether we will see another round of the redfish wars that dominated the coastal fishing scene of the 1970’s. If the battles do start, hopefully the redfish will come out of the winner once again. This awesome fish certainly deserves it.
10 Comments
That would be stupid and hopefully it never happens. What they need to be getting rid of is flounder giggers. Modern day gillnetters in my opinion. You want more flounder? Ban gigging. I also think the state should quit giving out the guide license. Make it like the fin fish license and you have to prove that 80 percent of your income is from guiding.
Seriously get rid of flounder gigging… why not get rid of fishing for redfish so they’ll stay plentiful and protected… I’m an avid angler myself but if you want to go after 1 species be fair across the board… further regulating us just means more fish for Mexico to get while they laugh at us let’s advocate for action there instead
i assume Gregzzz means commercial giggers as the recreational giggers don’t account for 16 percent of the numbers commercial people take. And, i don’t know of any honest commercial giggers as everyone i’ve met says “we stuck a hundred last night!! Don’t tell anyone” over the last ten years we have watched the founder population plummet.And why not, those lazy commercials that used to gill net reds, found an easy way rape another species by gigging all the flatfish they can!!
Instead of reopening commercial fishing, maybe increasing the daily bag limit and lower the minimum size to 16″.
The theme here is the commercial harvesting of a limited resource. The fishery simply can not sustain it. It’s the current issue with flounder and TPWD commission can’t get their heads out of their behinds and realize TX flounder should not be commercially fished. Commercial fisherman should be focused on fish farms and not public waterways!
Commercial flounder fishing has ruined the recreational fishing for flounder by hook and line. I have a house at the Texas coast and fish often. I rarely catch flounder. Is the TPW going to let flounder populations get to where the redfish were in the 70’s? Maybe they already have. The commercial limit of 30 per day is ridiculous. Adding to the fact that many off load and go back out the same night. The November/December 6 week closure is a start but has not sufficiently worked. Close the commercial fishery down.
The fishery belongs to the public as stated in the article. That does not mean most go to a tiny click of commercial fishermen that profit from the investment made by all of the sport fishermen.
agree with the above comments, commercial fishing for red fish will only ruin the redfish population in a very short period of time.. As far as gigging flounder, we need a very high fine (cost) for exceeding the limit and loss of liscence,
I agree that the Flounder should be placed on game fish status. The species is clearly declining. If not a permanent fix at least put a ban on gigging for a couple years to see how Flounder stocks respond. As far as Redfish go, please leave the status right where it is. I have witnessed first hand the population of the species before and after the redfish wars and would most certainly not want to relive that. If Louisiana has a problem with a declining fish or crab populations then they really need to examine their own regulations and limits and have no one to blame but themselves. No one likes more regulations or limits posed on all for the actions of a few, but there has to be intervention when stocks deplete and spiral defininately downward. My 2 cents.
There is no way commercial fishing can produce the income for a town, city, or state that recreational fishing does. From boat repair and storage, restaurant attendance, bait stand income, State Park income, hotel income, fuel sales, tackle sales, grocery store sales, etc; etc. Greed and irresponsibility have decimated this planet until a concerned group steps forward and says, “ENOUGH!” Leave good things alone.